Vigilant News

Eternal Vigilance is the price of liberty.

Ben Bartee

OpEd: Biden Doubles Down on Failed Drug War, Plots to Outlaw Nicotine

By ,

As if not unpopular enough, the Biden administration has announced plans to double down on the unwinnable drug war. This time, the alphabet boys are coming for the vapes.

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued marketing denial orders (MDOs) to JUUL Labs Inc. for all of their products currently marketed in the United States. As a result, the company must stop selling and distributing these products. In addition, those currently on the U.S. market must be removed, or risk enforcement action.”

At the same time, the Biden administration is also proposing a rule to cap the maximum allowable nicotine levels in cigarettes.

Last year, the FDA moved to ban menthol cigarettes on grounds that they’re purportedly racist and homophobic. According to acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock explains:

“The FDA will help significantly reduce youth initiation, increase the chances of smoking cessation among current smokers, and address health disparities experienced by communities of color, low-income populations, and LGBTQ+ individuals, all of whom are far more likely to use these tobacco products.”

No flavors, no mint, no good hard tobacco kick – no fun for you. If you’re lucky, you’ll get diluted, gray government nicotine – or, else, nothing at all.

——————-

The alleged motivations of the FDA/Biden administration bureaucrats are highly suspect. They’re on the job protecting your teenager from strawberry-flavored nicotine products. But, simultaneously, they’re more than willing to inject 6-month-olds with unnecessary and experimental gene therapies that don’t protect them from a virus that posed very little risk to them in the first place.

They’ll also shovel Ritalin and Adderall (an amphetamine salt which is, for all intents and purposes, essentially legal meth) down your kid’s throat so they’ll sit still in their public school library during drag queen story hour.

But they’ll protect them from the e-cigarettes that are already illegal to sell to minors.

—————

Even if an undeserved olive branch were extended, and the government’s motivations were assumed to be pure as the driven snow, the infantilization of the public is an insult to individual dignity.

If liberty means anything, it’s that adults are at liberty to take risks with their own health, safety, and even their lives. Protecting people from themselves – as a mother removes a AAA battery from her baby’s mouth – is not within the government’s purview.

—————-

Moreover, even if the government’s pure intentions and right to assume moral authority over what adults are allowed to ingest, what does the historical record say about the government’s ability to regulate banned substances?

Drug arrests are the #1 driver of mass incarceration in the Land of the Free, which is itself the #1 incarcerator in the world both in raw numbers and on a per capita basis.

But, drug warriors will then argue, mass incarceration – which costs tens of thousands of dollars per prisoner per year, incubates a criminal subculture, and robs non-violent drug users of their future – might be a steep cost, but maybe it’s worthwhile if it produces less drug use. Right?

Source: Reason

One of those lines is not like the other. Trillions of dollars later, drug addiction rates are roughly the same as 40 years ago.

In addition to failing to curb the appetite for the banned substance, prohibition also inevitably births new opportunities for entrepreneurs to operate outside of law in underground black markets:

“Though the advocates of prohibition had argued that banning sales of alcohol would reduce criminal activity, it in fact directly contributed to the rise of organized crime. After the Eighteenth Amendment went into force, bootlegging, or the illegal distillation and sale of alcoholic beverages, became widespread.”

Supply and demand always wins out. When an economic sector is pushed underground, all it produces, without exception, is more violence, more organized crime, dangerous/substandard products, and more destroyed futures.

—————–

America can’t win any other war despite massive resources. Why would the drug war be any different?

The US government spent at least $2.3 trillion (of accounted money – the true figure is probably higher) on the Afghanistan war, only to abandon the project twenty years later, leaving behind a sea of sophisticated military equipment in the hands of the Taliban.

The US government spent another $2+ trillion in Iraq (based on Deep State lies), only to abandon that project as well, destabilizing the entire country, plunging it into bloody civil war, and handing over a huge swathe of territory to a violent theocratic terror state.

Which federal employee was ever held accountable for their monumental failure – despite obscene funding? Dick Cheney, Bush, and the neoconservative war criminals responsible for the Iraq War walk free. The foremost drug war proponent in the Senate, Joe Biden, was awarded with the presidency.

————–

If the drug war were a private enterprise, investors and other stakeholders would have demanded proof of some modicum of progress. Without proof of efficacy, they would never continue dumping trillions into the project.

But in America, in 2022, the American public (the theoretical stakeholder and funder) has no say in public policy. This is not rhetorical hyperbole but rather documented statistical reality.

It doesn’t matter how ineffective the government intervention is – whether the stated aim is to depose a foreign dictator or control domestic drug consumption.

In large part, the looting of the public treasury is the point. Excess, escalating funding as a reward for continued failure by the executors of the drug war is the feature, not the bug.

The inevitable result of the tobacco ban will be more of the same: your tax money will be squandered in a failed attempt to dissuade you from accessing desired goods by restricting your liberties – all in the service of ulterior motives.

What the ban is guaranteed to achieve is a more self-perpetuating bureaucracy that serves no one’s interests but its own.

Ben Bartee is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs. Follow his stuff via Armageddon Prose and/or Substack, Patreon, Gab, and Twitter.

COVID Shots for Tots: Is This What Passes as a Heroic Whistleblower?

By ,

Via Ben Bartee of the Daily Bell

The government – which theoretically operates in the public interest – recently approved COVID-19 “shots for tots.” Pfizer and Moderna now have the Public Health© green light to inject babies as young as six months old with their experimental mRNA gene therapies.

In response, Johns Hopkins “public health” policy researcher Dr. Marty Makary wrote a gentle critique on procedural grounds of the CDC/NIH/FDA “vaxx them all agenda”

“With no solid clinical data, the agency authorized Covid vaccines for infants and toddlers, including those who already had Covid… Just months before, the FDA bypassed their external experts to authorize booster shots for young children.”

Cited “experts” lament the politicization of the regulatory process:

“One high level official at the CDC told us: ‘Things have become so political, so what are we there for?’ Another CDC scientist told us: ‘I used to be proud to tell people I work at the CDC. Now I’m embarrassed.’”

It apparently took this unnamed CDC moron two and a half years to realize the COVID agenda is political, not medical. He couldn’t be bothered to lend credibility to his claim by putting his name on the comment, presumably, to protect his lucrative government career. The best he could do to push back against cruel medical experimentation on children was to whisper misgivings anonymously into a colleague’s ear.

Profiles in courage.

Of course, all of this was exceedingly obvious years ago to anyone with a grade school education and basic human intuition.

But because we in America are properly trained to Respect the Science©, biomedical overlords are the only legitimate voice in the public discourse. Basic observable facts don’t count until a John Hopkins guy points them out.

—————

Johns Hopkins – Dr. Marty’s employer – was central to engineering the COVID lockdowns and injection agenda – and proudly and publicly so.

Dr. Marty’s conscience maybe bothers him a little – but not enough to resign his six-figure post.

His colleagues want to inject infants with experimental gene therapies with unknown long-term side effects to treat a disease that is statistically irrelevant to children’s health (the risk of death from COVID among children is 2 per million (0.0002%).

Dr. Marty politely disagrees. He’s respectable – not like the filthy rabble who forcefully denounce their enslavers. With his view from inside the belly of the beast, Dr. Marty knows better than most that disagreeing with Public Health© is racist, it’s transphobic; it’s basically a tacit acknowledgment of one’s Nazism.

WEF boy toy and sitting Canadian PM Justin Trudeau explains:

Dr. Marty doesn’t want any part of that action, because he has a mortgage and a car lease.

—————–

Dr. Marty and all of his collaborators in the biomedical state are complicit in crimes against humanity. They aid and abet illegal medical experimentation on society’s most vulnerable citizens. They are guilty merely by their defense of, and participation in, the institutions responsible for these crimes like Johns Hopkins.

By either their active malevolence or slavish acquiescence, biomedical technocrats are responsible for:

The Public Health© “experts” like Dr. Marty, either by years of silence or active engagement, granted rhetorical cover to the corporate media. Goons like CNN’s Don Lemon then leveraged their assumed moral authority to advocate ever-more draconian crackdowns – including barring the unvaxxed from grocery stores and even denying emergency medical care.

This is coercion, and it is a moral atrocity – one which would never have been possible without the rubber-stamping of the “experts.” Government technocrats and their corporate media stenographers, when pressed, always had the trump card: the “experts” agreed with them.

——————-

Of course, the popular line is that the COVID-19 virus itself – and not the lockdowns, vaxx mandates, and mask mandates – caused the devastation. This “pandemic made us to it” talking point is nonsense. Responsibility for the fallout lays squarely at the feet of the Deep State bureaucrats who enforced the lockdowns at the point of the government gun.

The virus didn’t lock anyone down. The government did that all on its own, without the consent of the governed. And they cited Public Health© “expert” recommendations as their convenient justification.

———————-

Imagine a KKK member penning an op-ed like Dr. Marty’s and expecting praise for his bravery: “Yeah, it’s probably not the best that my peers maraud through the countryside extrajudicially executing random victims and inflicting untold terror among the innocents for political purposes. But I’ll keep collecting my paycheck as a leading member of the organization. I gotta eat.”

Dr. Marty clears the lowest bar for heroism in world history. He gets a pass he doesn’t deserve because he wears a clean, pressed white coat on – the closest thing to God on Earth. He cloaks himself in the veneer of responsibility and altruism.

Wolf in sheep’s clothing

As the new priest class, the corporate media has inculcated idol worship at the altar of the Public Health© theocracy.

In a morally upright world, by this late date, Dr. Marty and his venerated Public Health© colleagues would be prone in front of a military tribunal in orange jumpsuits, hoods over their heads Abu Ghraib-style, hands clasped in prayer position, appealing to the mercy of the court, begging for a life sentence in lieu of the guillotine.

Ben Bartee is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs. Follow his stuff via Armageddon Prose and/or Substack, Patreon, Gab, and Twitter.

White House Diversity Hire’s Utter Incompetence Highlights Identity Politics Failure

By ,

Just two months in, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre is the most monumental failure at the podium in recorded history:

“It’s been a rocky first month for White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. Her answers have baffled reporters, and even made some of her White House colleagues wince.”

Imagine how bad her performance really has been to induce neoliberal Politico into writing such an unflattering intro paragraph.

That’s like a Hindu priest beating a sacred cow. Ordinarily, while covering a sacrosanct immigrant lesbian Person of Color© in such a position, Politico would fawn.

Just how historically awful has Jean-Pierre been? More importantly, what lesson does her failure teach on the hollowness of leftist identity politics?

——————–

At her coronation as Biden’s new press secretary, Team Biden explicitly marketed Jean-Pierre as a diversity hire:

“So, I just want to take the opportunity to celebrate and congratulate… Karine Jean-Pierre…
First, as you all know, she will be the first Black woman, the first out LGBTQ+ person to serve in this role, which is amazing, because representation matters.”
-Outgoing Press Secretary Jen Psaki, May 6, 2022

Since taking the podium, no individual has done more to singlehandedly undermine the affirmative action principle.

This specimen of mediocrity has been a spectacular failure. Without exception or exaggeration, each and every Jean-Pierre press conference has been an unmitigated trainwreck. I suffered through most of them, because I’m a  masochist.

Words alone can’t do justice. Some disasters have to be witnessed firsthand, up-close to appreciate, like a class V hurricane:

Consider her performance on June 2, 2022, in the throes of the baby formula shortage:

(34:48)

“Q: Did the President have any conversations with any Cabinet Secretaries or the FDA commissioner once he was confirmed in February about the formula shortage before April?

A: Look, you know, as — as more — as you all know, the President spoke to — to this yesterday: As more abnormalities were seen in supply and sales started to decrease in April — you know, because people have asked about this — senior White House staff made — made the President aware of the problem, and this was in April. I don’t have any calls to read out for you.”

Look how many hyphens the transcriptionist had to insert there. Stammering and stuttering, Jean-Pierre muddled through the pre-written talking points script in her notebook that someone competent prepared for her.

Even so, she failed to directly answer the question about whom the president talked to and when – or even come close.

The reporter politely followed up, not having received an answer, and she rambled further:

“I — so, as you know, the President deals with issues on a regular basis and that — that boils up to him.   And it’s just an — there’s no specific person that I can call out to you.  But it’s the regular way that we — we move forward through the regular channels.  I don’t have a specific person.  But that’s — that’s kind of how it goes.”

How it goes, indeed. That’s how unaccountability and the incompetent bureaucracy of a failed state goes.

The handpicked, compliant press corps attempted to get an answer to the same softball question – when and from whom Joe Biden first learned of the baby formula shortage – a minimum of eight more times.

Each time her answer was equally nonsensical. In response, she flipped through her notebook full of pre-canned answers, fingered one that might somehow tangentially connect to the question, read it (poorly), and moved on.

Literally, a well-trained sixth-grader could deliver a more inspiring product. Again, she wasn’t speaking extemporaneously off the cuff – she attempted to read basic sentences off of her notebook, and failed even at that.

—————

The whole charade is a disgusting affront to the American people who pay Jean-Pierre’s and Biden’s salaries to role-play stewards of state.

Remember when the Biden administration and the corporate media promised, with the blackest humor, that “the adults are back in charge“?

When diversity takes precedence over competence, the “adults” aren’t in charge of anything. Unless, of course, by “adults,” one means the oligarchs who actually run the gears of state to rob the American public.

Those “adults” don’t care how dysfunctional the executive gets so long as the gravy train of favorable regulation and public subsidy for their private gain continues.

At least Jean-Pierre’s predecessor, Jen Psaki, could lie with a modicum of grace. Granted, Psaki was equally soulless and her moral compass equally broken. Yet she could at least string together a single-sentence lie without reading.

No one in their right mind believes Jean-Pierre would have gotten within a mile of that podium if she was a white man – unless maybe she was a trans white dude. Those are cool, and diverse.

Of course, the woke inmates who run the White House asylum pin the blame squarely on the nearest white man for Jean-Pierre’s failings:

“Some Black communications officials in and outside the administration, along with allies of Jean-Pierre, feel White House leadership has set her up to fail by having Kirby, a white man who was in the running for her job, hovering nearby and taking the lead on foreign policy.”

No way! Who could have predicted the blame-whitey routine?

By “hovering,” of course, they mean Kirby doing Jean-Pierre’s job for her on the high-stakes foreign policy front so as to avert a nuclear holocaust.

 

The Biden administration finds itself between a rock and a hard place. Every single newsday that Jean-Pierre is trotted out to the world to humiliate herself and her colleagues, the whole presidency’s credibility sinks even lower. Yet, the administration can’t get rid of her because that would be racist, homophobic, misogynist, etc.… all the isms. Then, it’d have a mutiny on its hands.

If you close your eyes, you can already divine the Buzzfeed headlines: KKK Biden Throws Diverse, Talented, Sacred Person of Color© Press Secretary Under the Bus After Two Months on the Job!

Biden’s handlers unleashed the SJW monster on themselves; they made their bed; now they have to lie in it. That’s called sweet, savory karma.

Originally Posted @ the Daily Bell

Ben Bartee is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs. Follow his stuff via Armageddon Prose and/or Substack, Patreon, Gab, and Twitter.

Disinfo Governance Board is Back: ‘White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse’

By ,

The “Disinformation Governance Board” went belly-up last month. Apparently, the Orwellian authoritarianism was just too blatant.

But the censorship agenda certainly didn’t go away, it just changed forms. MAGA terrorists aren’t going to castrate themselves. It’s a dirty job, but someone’s got to do it.

Spare the rod, spoil the child.

Meet your newest BDSM dungeon master, the more innocuous-sounding “White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse.”

It’s essentially the Disinformation Governance Board pig with lipstick – same censorship regime, same aims to suppress political opposition, same corporate-state sponsors.

The emotional pandering to justify censorship kicks off at 19:30 with an obscure professional tennis player cry bully and self-proclaimed “mental health advocate.” Her name is irrelevant in this context; what is relevant is her identity as a victim of the appropriate gender and race. She recounts with great melancholy, in somber tones, her vague story of “online abuse.”

She is a survivor of literal violence via the internet, she explains, stunning and brave. The gist of her complaint is that people are sometimes mean to her on Twitter. She doesn’t enjoy unpleasantness on social media, despite the fact that she’s a public figure. She equates unkind words to threats to her safety.

Obviously, ergo, words must be banned.

Progressive lioness, the very embodiment of bravery and stunningness, AOC, agrees. Once, leftist commentator Jimmy Dore wrote “fuck her” on the internet regarding a political dispute. That was also literal violence.

Having established the proper victim narrative – speech that privileged members of society don’t like is violence (and probably racist and transphobic and ableist as well) — Kamala Harris then presents herself.

She is in an equally melodramatic mood, as her handlers instructed her to be, for the inauguration of the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse.

Kamala congratulates the token victim promoting censorship for her stunning bravery. She includes in her affirming comments her weird, overly rehearsed sappy hand waving to denote nonverbal empathy. This unseemly communication strategy was presumably taught to her in some PR training program for robots to make them appear more humanlike.

The combination of Kamala’s arm-flailing and the translator on screen must raise hell for the actual hearing-disabled to keep up with all the nonverbal stuff. Then again, the whole spectacle is not really about accommodating the hearing disabled, is it? The performance is a virtue signal of the government’s “inclusiveness.”

Following Kamala, Attorney General Merrick Garland takes the stage. The top law enforcement official in the United States apparently has nothing better to do, like combatting fentanyl imports from China or prosecuting Wall St bankers actively demolishing the economy.

From his perch at the lectern, he declares a neoliberal fatwa against the First Amendment citing concerns over vague threats to the LGBTQ+++© community and Communities of Color©.

At 38:45, they introduce the diverse surgeon general festooned in his costume — intended to enhance his authority.

Online “harassment” and “abuse,” he explains using the nonverbal Kamala arms, is really a “public health” issue. Of course it is. Everything is now a biomedical state Public Health© permanent emergency. Why would online “harassment” be any different? The “experts” have deemed it so and assumed authority over everything.

——————–

The important questions they won’t ask are:

  • Why are people so emotionally fragile that they require the government to soothe their hurt feelings by punishing their ideological opponents for speech?
  • Even if censorship of free expression online were a laudable goal, where does the government derive the authority to do so?
  • Who will oversee the overseers to ensure they won’t abuse their power?

None of those questions are addressed even in passing. Instead, they merely announce the stripping of more of Americans’ rapidly vanishing rights by undermining fundamental Constitutional rights. No further explanation is required. Who needs legal authority – did you not see the diverse Person of Color© hatecrime victim at the beginning? Censorship is an emergency moral issue.

“Abuse” and “harassment” obviously — just like “hatespeech” or “dangerous speech” or any other machination of social justice academics — mean whatever the government wants them to mean at any given time.

Their definitions are flexible across contexts and wholly arbitrary.

I, for instance, got kicked off Facebook for merely using a word that rhymes with “canny” in jest. I didn’t mean it. The term wasn’t even directed at any particular individual! Whom did I “abuse”? Whom did I “harass”? Facebook never elaborated on the details.

At the time, there was no specific prohibition of that term on the platform – but it didn’t matter.

When you give a bureaucrat a ban hammer, everything becomes a nail – whether he/she/non-binary works for the government or a tech corporation (which, in practice, are increasingly one and the same).

—————-

This metaphor, one I’ve used probably a half dozen times, is cliché. But I don’t care because it’s perfect.

The social justice activists (and the government that uses them to justify their censorship regimes) are Hamas terrorists firing rockets from schools and hospitals. They frame their narratives to strawman their opponents as evil bigots attacking “online safety” or “human rights” or whatever. Any pushback is an attack on protected classes.

The “White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse” is yet another cheap trick by political extremists to slip through Orwellian censorship regimes under the auspices of some variation of human rights.

Let us reject them and remove them from power.

Originally Published @ the Daily Bell

Ben Bartee is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs. Follow his stuff via Armageddon Prose and/or Substack, Patreon, Gab, and Twitter.

COVID Propaganda Roundup: ‘Shots For Tots’ (They Finally Came For the Babies)

By ,

Ben Bartee – July 01, 2022
Reposted with permission from The Daily Bell

If you’re into profiting off of human misery, consider investing in manufacturers of toddler-sized mini-coffins.

Perhaps, for instance, Abbey Caskets’ Traditional Infant Poplar in Cherry Finish at $499.00 plus tax. Pfizer won’t help the parents afford it, but the government will take its cut of the profits.

Death and taxes, etc.

—————–

We predicted successfully months ago that the child shots were on their way because the leftist social engineers have a fetish for pulling kids into their biomedical cult.

Whether the agenda item is transing them before they hit puberty or injecting them with experimental gene therapies, getting the children started on these biomedical regimens as early as possible is priority #1. Like all zealots, the social engineers like to get them young when they’re most vulnerable, manageable, and impressionable.

The biomedical needle orgy for 6-month-olds begins. Via Associated Press:

“The nation’s infants, toddlers and preschoolers are finally getting their chance at COVID-19 vaccination as the U.S. rolls out shots for tots this week…

The CDC advises vaccination even for those who already had COVID-19… For the littlest kids, there’s Pfizer’s three-shot series or Moderna’s two shots.”

“Shots for tots” – if that focus-grouped sales gimmick doesn’t induce a shiver down your spine, consider that you may have lost your soul.

Above: Biomedical cult ritual child sacrifice

Some unfortunate toddler named Fletcher has been held hostage under house arrest for years now, isolated, out of the sun, likely vitamin D-deficient as a result, probably strapped into a Meta headset or whatever. His escape depends on his unhinged mother shooting him up with the Pfizer gene therapy:

“Little Fletcher Pack woke up Monday morning and asked: ‘Is today vaccine day?’ For the 3-year-old… the answer was yes…

Fletcher’s mother said that once her son is fully vaccinated, he can finally go bowling and visit the nearby children’s museum…

‘He’s never really played with another kid inside before.’”

US only country in the world vaxxing babies 

“The U.S. is now the only country in the world that vaccinated children as young as six months old.”

Several European countries, in fact, restrict vaxxing anyone under 30 due to the risks of myocarditis and other side effects.

Biden’s handlers would accuse those European states of Disrespecting the Science©.

Above: a proud mother Respects the Science©, offers child as tribute to biomedical gods

Babies’ risk of COVID death infinitesimally tiny

As we’ve explained in depth before, the risk of death from COVID among children is 2 per million (0.0002%). That’s likely an OVER-estimate of the risk, given undocumented instances of children’s exposure.

The vaxxes don’t stop infection, babies don’t get sick with COVID, so what’s the point?

One who assumes benevolent intent on the part of the government and corporate authorities might be forgiven for assuming any of this is about Public Health©.

The functions of the COVID-19 mRNA child-stabbing are profit and social control. Pfizer isn’t done milking the pandemic for all it’s worth (which is tens of billions and counting). The government isn’t done inventing new permanent emergency powers for itself via the biomedical state.

Above: a biomedical priestess does Science©, injects alchemy potion

Corporate media admits vaxxes don’t stop new variants, encourages them anyway

The pro-vaxx corporate propaganda doesn’t even claim the mRNA shots prevent infection anymore.

Via CNN:

“A.4 and BA.5 appear to escape antibody responses among… those who have been fully vaccinated and boosted… However, Covid-19 vaccination is still expected to provide substantial protection against severe disease.”

Notice the careful use of “expected” – because they have no evidence whatsoever that the vaxxes will provide any substantial protection against emerging variants. All they have to offer are “expectations” whispered into their ear by their Big Pharma advertisers, which they dutifully reprint.

The cited virologist, Dr. Dan Barouch, predicts mass infections among the vaccinated:

“Our data suggest that these new Omicron subvariants will likely be able to lead to surges of infections in populations with high levels of vaccine immunity.”

When pressed by Sen. Rand Paul in a Jun 16 Senate hearing, Warlord Fauci didn’t present any evidence of efficacy for the COVID shots in children – only “assumptions”:

Paul (00:09): Are you aware of any studies that show reduction in hospitalization or death for children who take a booster?

[Fauci refuses to directly answer question, repeats talking points citing purported efficacy in the elderly, not children.]

…

Fauci (2:30): If you look at the data from Israel, the boosts… was associated with a clear-cut clinical effect, mostly in elderly people… but also… in people in their 40s and 50s…

Paul: But not in childen.

Fauci: Well… [trails off into talking points, doesn’t refute Paul’s assertion.]

Paul: You’re not willing to be honest with the American people.

Indeed not.

Paul goes on to explain that the only proof that the FDA used to “recommend” (soon to become “mandate” if they get their way) the shots for babies was short-term antibody generation. No long-term study of potential side effects occurred.

Basic virology establishes that antibody response via blood testing does not equate to clinical efficacy. The FDA itself acknowledges that fact. Warlord Fauci knows that; he’s lying on purpose to maximize injection numbers in children, devastating health consequences be damned.

The FDA also didn’t factor in prior infection in children whatsoever into their recommendations. They didn’t even collect any data on that subject.

The “experts” at the FDA who approved this calamity need to be prosecuted, convicted, and duly punished for their crimes against humanity in Nuremberg II.

Examples must be made. Catharsis must be had. Lady Justice’s thirst must be quenched.

Ben Bartee is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs. Follow his stuff via Armageddon Prose and/or Substack, Patreon, Gab, and Twitter.