Vigilant News

Eternal Vigilance is the price of liberty.

WHO

Disease X: WHO Still Pushing for Pandemic Treaty

By ,

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, is continuing to pursue ratifying what has been called a “Pandemic Treaty,” urging nations to sign to better prepare for “Disease X.”

Analysts have warned that the so called pandemic treaty, a subversive initiative that’s gone through several name changes over the last year and a half, would essentially elevate the WHO to a defacto world government in the event of another pandemic or global health crisis.

Author’s Note: I’ve written extensively on this topic for Badlands Media, to learn more please read Behold, a Trojan Horse and The WHOs Last Stand.

“‘Disease X’ is a placeholder for an unknown pathogen that could cause a global emergency,” Ghebreyesus recently wrote on Twitter. “History has taught us that we must anticipate new threats. Failing to prepare leaves the world prepared to fail.”

Naturally, the WHO Director did not miss an opportunity to make a case for the treaty at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, last week.

“The pandemic agreement can bring all the experience, all the challenges that we have faced, and all the solutions into one. And that agreement can help us to prepare for the future in a better way because this is a common enemy and without a shared response, starting from the preparedness you know we will face the same problem as COVID,” Ghebreyesus said.

The deadline for the agreement has now been pushed back to May 2024.

“It’s better actually to anticipate something that may happen, because it has happened in our history many times, and prepare for it. We shouldn’t face things unprepared,” Ghebreyesus also said.

 

The WHO’s Monumental Power Grab is Still on the Table
The "WHO CA+", colloquially known as the "Pandemic Treaty", seeks to elevate the WHO to a de facto world-governing body in the event of another pandemic.

By ,

The World Health Organization is still pushing the proposed “pandemic treaty” as well as the highly controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).

Countless analysts have cautioned that the ratification of either, let alone both, would devastate or even completely strip away sovereignty from nation-states and place public health decision-making power in the hands of the WHO and its director-general.

According to author and researcher James Roguski, these two proposals would morph the WHO from an advisory organization to a defacto world government whose edicts would become legally binding.

They also would greatly expand the scope and reach of the IHR, institute a system of global health certificates and “passports” and allow the WHO to mandate medical examinations, quarantine, and treatment.

 

What is the WHO CA+?

In December 2021, it was decided at a special session of the World Health Assembly to establish an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (“INB”), representing all regions of the world, to draft and negotiate “a WHO convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.”

Soon after, the term “Pandemic Treaty” began floating in and out of public awareness but was never clearly defined by the press or the institutions advocating for it.

The usual suspects in the mainstream media seemed more concerned with convincing the public that their suspicions were invalid than effectively explaining what the so-called treaty actually proposed.

Outlets like SkyNews Australia at least tried to warn of the potential dangers

So, what exactly is the Pandemic Treaty?

For starters, the Pandemic Treaty isn’t really a treaty at all, but rather what’s called a “Convention agreement”, and as such isn’t subject to the typical requirements for ratification, namely having to pass a vote in the U.S. Senate.

Additionally, the proper name for this “convention agreement” is “The WHO CA+”.

On May 22nd, 2023, the “Drafting Group of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body to Draft and Negotiate a WHO Convention, Agreement, or Other International Instrument on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response” released an unedited draft titled “The Bureau’s Text of the WHO CA+”. (#)

The Bureau’s Text revealed the true goals of the WHO and its funders, goals that are so unabashedly dystopian in scope that most people would assume they were satyrical.

The proposed treaty establishes a “Conference of the Parties” or C.O.P., which would essentially become a new bureaucracy beyond Congressional or Parliamentary oversight and control. (# Article 20)

This group would include:

 “Representatives of the United Nations and its specialized agencies” as well as “representatives of any body or organization, whether national or international, governmental or nongovernmental, private sector or public sector, which is qualified in matters covered by the WHO CA+”

These individuals would be empowered to add protocols to the agreement without the consent of the public. (# Article 34)

Despite the convoluted jargon used in the Bureau’s text, this transfer of power from We the People to the unaccountable, unelected, and mostly invisible members of the so-called “Conference of the Parties” has been described as a veiled but direct attack on the sovereignty of nations.

In a nutshell, the pandemic treaty, or WHO CA+, will grant the WHO power over far more than ‘pandemic’ responses. Under the new convention, the WHO’s dictates will supersede and overrule any and all local, state, and federal laws (whether or not they will be able to enforce those dictates has yet to be seen.)

Some of the proposals in the pandemic treaty include:

  • Setting up an international supply network overseen by the WHO
  • Funding the WHO’s health emergency structures and processes by requiring at least 5% of national health budgets to be dedicated to health emergencies.
  • Setting up a governing body under the auspice of the WHO to oversee the entire health emergency process.
  • Expanding the scope of the WHO’s power by implementing the “One Health” agenda, which recognizes that a very broad range of aspects of life and the environment can impact health and therefore fall under the “potential” to cause harm.

Consider the implications of this.

Just about anything can be sold as “potentially harmful” when you consider that the affiliated media has the ability to shape the public discourse, essentially determining how people should think and feel about any given topic. As long as the media pumps out sufficient fear and propaganda, the scope of the WHO’s power will be limited only by their imagination.

Additionally, the emphasis on the “One Health” concept, combines human health, animal health, and environmental concerns, meaning that under the One Health agenda, the WHO would be given the power to make decisions concerning diet, agriculture and livestock farming, environmental pollution, the movement of populations, and much more.

 

WHO Now Urging Member States to Finalize

Tedros Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO, opened the Global Symposium of Global Health Security and Diplomacy in the 21st Century on Monday by saying that the coming year is “a generational opportunity that we must not miss.”

“As you know, Member States are now in the process of negotiating a new legally binding agreement on pandemic preparedness and response, and amendments to the International Health Regulations,” he said, adding that “the two will form the vital legal framework for a safer world.”

Ghebreyesus has said in the past that a Pandemic Treaty would not force countries to follow its rules, but he has also threatened to punish countries that don’t. He also listed three action plans for all member states to follow starting Monday, the first being that “we must close the governance gap.”

He’s also hinted that “misinformation”, IE unsanctioned scrutiny and dissent, is going to be an obstacle for the WHO in bringing this agenda forward. Amongst his list of hurdles to overcome, Ghebreyesus said on Monday that one of the challenges ahead is the increase of public skepticism with regard to institutions and science.

December is the month that they are going to try to push the Pandemic treaty forward. Remember, there’s no ratification process for a convention agreement, it exists because the Convention of Parties decides it exists, and with the powers that will be granted to the WHO should this convention agreement move forward, we would all be subject to the will of the WHO and its primary funders should another pandemic mysteriously appear.

 

Author’s Note:

I realize that this might all sound a lot more frightening than it really is. It is a pressing situation that deserves our attention, to be sure, but it is not a death sentence for the Constitution.

I’ve been trying to imagine how any of this would actually be enforced. The WHO is like a paper tiger, it doesn’t have its own policing force unless the Federal gov can convince State and local authorities to sell out the people in their communities, and given the current climate and the disillusionment that came after the response to COVID, I don’t know how that would play out. Maybe I’m too optimistic.

Additionally, for a more learned opinion on the subject, I would direct folks to the great James Roguski. I recommend checking out his latest post on the “Treaty” linked HERE.

If you are particularly interested in learning the more granular details about this subject, I highly recommend listening to this recent Twitter Space with Roguski hosted by Maze Love.

Exposing the Pandemic Industrial Complex

By ,

Joe Biden, in a September 2022 interview with 60 Minutes, stated that “The pandemic is over” to the chagrin of the establishment media and even his own staff.

Outlets like NPR were quick to criticize the statement, saying that at least 400 people were still dying of COVID every day. These types of vague statements persist even though most of the public is unaware of what actually qualifies as a COVID death (#)(#), or just how accurate the PCR tests actually are. These are still points of contention between the two prevailing narratives.

The CDC has significantly eased up on its restrictions, but many people are still wearing masks and carrying on as if this type of behavior really is the “new normal”. “15 days to slow the curve” became a two-year sentence, and by the time the lockdowns were over, COVID fear seemed to have ingrained itself into our society.

But not everyone was susceptible to this fear.

Across the world, freedom-loving people decided to stand up for their rights, and push back against what many saw as excessive overreach.

And others hope to take things a step further.

Joe Biden may be ready to try and sweep the last two years under the rug, but there’s a veritable army of physicians, lawyers, and everyday citizens the world over who aren’t willing to let what they see as crimes against humanity go quietly into the night.

 

There are two prevailing narratives in regard to the origin and purpose of SARS-CoV-2.

The mainstream narrative, supported by a majority of the Intelligence Community, adamantly suggests that the outbreak was caused by “natural exposure to an animal  infected with (SARS-CoV-2) or a close progenitor virus”

The other narrative, one that has been gaining more traction as time goes on, is that the virus was either accidentally or intentionally released from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. (#)(#)

The trail of evidence, and it is now a substantial amount of evidence, points toward the Wuhan lab leak as the probable origin.

Some of the world’s most accomplished medical professionals, an army of legal experts, and sleuths across the internet have been putting together a compelling case that the pandemic may have been the result of a man-made bioweapon, and that its planning began decades ago.

Though many of the leading voices of this movement are not in complete agreement about certain aspects of what has been called a “worldwide plandemic” there are some points of nearly unanimous agreement:

  • COVID-19 is a bioweapon and possibly the product of gain of function research paid for with our tax dollars.
  • There are people in the US  government as well as private individuals who had advanced knowledge of the pandemic.
  • Through an intricate web of corporations and institutions, what has been referred to as the “pandemic virus industrial complex” has facilitated quite possibly the largest upward transfer of wealth in human history.
  • The deeper purpose behind the pandemic is to consolidate power and move the world closer to global dictatorship.

Naturally, claims as bold as these require substantial evidence. Fortunately, there is more than enough evidence to build an irrefutable case against what can only be described as the Pandemic Industrial Complex.

 

The Supporting Evidence

It was a physician named Jonathan Latham who first introduced the phrase “Pandemic Virus Industrial Complex” during a lecture in January of 2021 on the various COVID-19 origin theories. He used the phrase to describe the academic, military, and commercial complexes that are driving the pandemic agenda and obscuring all facts that indicate SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade virus.

 

Just like the military-industrial complex, the pandemic virus industrial complex is a set of interlocking corporations and other institutions that feed off of and support each other in a self-reinforcing way.

Marion Koopmans, a dutch virologist with the World Health Organization, has been a thorn in the side of WHO Director Tedros Ghebreyesus, one of the primary players in this “global health” system. Koopmans has accused the WHO of undermining her research into the origins of COVID. Koopmans also claimed that WHO has been planning on ten years of infectious diseases, and that 2020 was only year one.

VIDEO: https://rumble.com/v15kpb0-why-would-a-who-virologist-say-this.html

Maybe it’s just a coincidence, but it is worth noting that in 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation, which has a history of backing population control mechanisms such as eugenics and GMOs, also published “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” describing a “coronavirus pandemic” that results in worldwide tyranny. In the Foundation’s own words, in a section for a hypothetical future called “Lock Step” it mentions “A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.”

In 2015, another player Dr. Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance that funneled research dollars from the NIAID to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus research, stated: “We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.” Daszak has publicly boasted about manipulating a killer SARS-like virus in Wuhan [Clip start at 0:40] and has claimed to have been working with the US Central Intelligence Agency.

Between the years 2017 and 2018, hundreds of millions of COVID-19 test kits were distributed worldwide. Of course, every major “fact-checker” claims to have debunked this truth, but upon closer inspection, the “debunking” does not hold up under scrutiny. They claim that since the test kits weren’t labeled as being specifically for COVID-19 until after the outbreak was announced, the claims are untrue, but the fact remains that they were indeed used to fuel and track the pandemic (while also producing false positives #,#).

On its own, this information might seem innocuous, but the devil is in the context…

In 2017, Anthony Fauci guaranteed that a “surprise outbreak” would occur within the next 4 years. (Clip: https://rumble.com/v1lzkdw-covid-19-pandemic-.html ) Bill Gates echoed similar sentiments in an OpEd for Business Insider around the same time. Think about that, arguably the two biggest names associated with the pandemic industrial complex just happen to simultaneously predict a global pandemic as hundreds of millions of tests are distributed worldwide. It’s either one of the world’s greatest coincidences or supporting evidence of a conspiracy.

2017 must have been a big year for the burgeoning Pandemic Industrial Complex, as Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security also published a “futuristic scenario” describing a coronavirus pandemic that would emerge in  Southeast Asia called SPARS.

One year before the coronavirus outbreak, a European virologist trained global leaders in the globalist non-profit think tank Chatham House aka Royal Institute for International Affairs (the European arm of the Council on Foreign Relations) on how to ensure control over the public during a pandemic by creating fear through inflated death numbers, as well as how to manipulate the public into getting vaccinated. [Clip starting at 1:10 https://rumble.com/v1n5uje-marc-van-ranst-liar-liar-pants-on-fire.html ] We see the continuation of this tactic today with assurances that “at least 400 people are still dying every day”.

6 months before the coronavirus pandemics’ official start date, the Australian Government published a 230-page management plan for an influenza pandemic.

5 months before the Pandemic officially hit, the World Health Organization was already instructing nations to prepare for such an event, saying that Countries, donors, and multilateral institutions (a nicer way of saying “the Pandemic Industrial Complex”) must be prepared for a “rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen”.

In the same month, the Global Vaccination Summit called for “strong surveillance systems” to ensure ongoing injections for the entire world population.

4 months before the pandemic, Bill Gates organized an exercise called Event 201, a simulation exercise on a worldwide corona epidemic. An emphasis was put on “global business and government working together”.

In that same month, Fauci and HHS officials at the Milken Institutes Future of Health Summit discussed the need for a “global event” to “disrupt the system” thereby making the public more willing to accept an experimental mRNA vaccine.

[Clip1: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5005992/user-clip-michael-specter-blowing-system-vaccines-created
Clip2: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4993177/user-clip-entity-excitement-pt-2 ]

These are just a handful of examples from an Everest-sized mountain of supporting evidence suggesting that this pandemic was manmade, released intentionally, and planned long ago.

WHO is Set to Decide Whether Monkeypox Should be Elevated to ‘Public Health Emergency’ Status

By ,

Ryan DeLarme
June 23rd, 2022

The World Health Organization is set to decide this Thursday whether it will declare Monkeypox a global health emergency.

The WHO, a United Nations agency, declared back in January that the virus was an emergency, the upcoming decision will potentially see the threat level rise to “public health emergency of international concern”, which, according to Reuters, is the WHO’s highest level of alert.

Monkeypox does not appear to spread nearly as easily as COVID but it has still raised alarm.

The case count from the current outbreak outside of Africa has topped 3,000 in more than 40 countries, according to a Reuters tally – largely among men who have sex with men – since it was first reported in May. As of yet, there have been no reports of deaths.

The WHO will convene a closed meeting of experts at 12 p.m. (1000 GMT) in Geneva. It remains unclear when the decision will be announced.

Author’s Opinion:  It is uncertain what steps if any will be taken, but if the COVID debacle of 2020 is any indication, if there is wealth to be made, then it’s a sure bet those who are in the know have already positioned themselves to do so, that is including those who have the power to hype up an otherwise non-threat.

The FDA’s Cozy Relationship with the Pharmaceutical Industry
Big-Pharma couldn't do it with out the FDA, and vice versa.

By ,

Ryan DeLarme
May, 12th, 2022

People rushed to tout the FDA approval of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine back in September of 2021 as if it were some great scientific victory. The troubling part is that the institution’s shady history seems to be all but forgotten.

No matter how you slice it, the Pharmaceutical industry is the central engine of the global health establishment. The industry’s larger corporations (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, etc.) provide funding for the FDA, the CDC, and the WHO; they do this both directly and through NGOs like the EPDA. It was recently reported that pharmaceutical giants are raking in the money with the sale of their novel and inadequately tested COVID-19 vaccines. Pfizer expects to earn $33.5 billion in 2021. J&J estimates its full-year COVID-19 vaccine sales to be $2.5 billion while Moderna forecasts $19.2 billion. These enormous figures will be grossly surpassed when one considers the forthcoming round of booster shots and the profits those will yield.

When it comes to lobbying money spent in 2021, the Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America group ranks number three nationally. Interestingly, the fourth, fifth, and sixth positions are also members of the health establishment. These are the American Hospital Association, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and the American Medical Association, respectively. Pfizer by itself is number 15.

The ties between the FDA and Big Pharma run deep, their relationship has become so symbiotic that neither could exist without the other unless massive reforms were to take place. Big Pharma relies on the FDA to approve and rush its products to market and the FDA relies on Big Pharma to receive its funding. Not only that but there seems to be a revolving door of FDA Commissioners landing on the boards of these Pharmaceutical companies.

Scott Gottlieb, who stepped down as FDA Commissioner in the spring of 2019, soon found himself sitting comfortably on Pfizer’s board of directors.  Gottlieb’s predecessor, DR. Margaret Hamburg, landed a cushy position on the board of Directors for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Steven Hahn, the former FDA Commissioner under Donald Trump, wound up at Flagship Pioneering; the venture capital firm that launched Moderna.

The list goes on and on, in fact, 9 out of the last 10 FDA commissioners —representing nearly four decades of agency leadership— have gone on to work for pharmaceutical companies. The lone exception is David Kessler, who joined the ranks in academia before eventually settling in his current position as chair of the board of directors at the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

Criticism of the modern medical-industrial complex has triggered many arguments, this is particularly true in the age of COVID. Regardless of whatever stance you take on any medical debate, it is undeniable that the industry operates in the same mafia-esque fashion as the Media, Big Tech, and Big Government.