Vigilant News

Eternal Vigilance is the price of liberty.

Justin Deschamps

CONSTITUTIONAL VICTORY: SCOTUS Strips EPA of Authority It Never Had in West Virginia v. EPA

By ,

WASHINGTON DC — In a 6 to 3 ruling today, the Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority, preventing the agency from exercising it’s claimed power to reduce carbon emissions in concert with the Biden administration’s April 2021.

In a ruling that angered climate change activists, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr, writing the majority opinion, said that the EPA had not received proper authority from Congress to limit carbon emissions.

It was believed, that the Clean Air Act in concert with initiatives put forward by the Obama administration, that the EPA had all the authority it needed, but that is not the case.

At issue, is the question in the case, West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 20-1530, whether the Clean Air Act allowed the EPA to codify sweeping regulations that have the force of law, without proper Congressional involvement.

The key issue, in this writer’s opinion, is that any rights of the body corporate, We The People, cannot be infringed without proper consent from the people. Congress provides the mechanism of consent at a national level, especially since the supposed climate change science is hardly a settled issue. The EPA cannot unilaterally act as if it has that de jure authority. If SCOTUS did side with the EPA, it would have, in effect, authorized the EPA’s side-stepping of the people’s rights through Congress. And SCOTUS would have, in effect, granted rights to the EPA in a similar way that Roe v Wade created rights in the recently overturned ruling from the ’70s.

The decision exposed the judicial activism of some of the liberal justices in the court.

Justice Elena Kagan, in dissent of the ruling, said,

“Whatever else this court may know about, it does not have a clue about how to address climate change,” … “And let’s say the obvious: The stakes here are high. Yet the court today prevents congressionally authorized agency action to curb power plants’ carbon dioxide emissions.”

Whether SCOTUS “does not have a clue about how to address climate change” isn’t the issue. The issue is whether the EPA can grant itself rights it never had to address climate change—which is not scientifically proven to exist. And if the highest court in the land should go along with the EPA’s renegade strategies.

The fact that a sitting justice doesn’t seem to understand the importance of Congress and is all too ready to use SCOTUS to manufacture rights and legislate from the bench has alarmed many.

Patrick Morrisey, the attorney general of West Virginia and one of the leaders of the challenge to the E.P.A.’s authority, welcomed the decision.

“E.P.A. can no longer sidestep Congress to exercise broad regulatory power that would radically transform the nation’s energy grid and force states to fundamentally shift their energy portfolios away from coal-fired generation,” he said.

Morrisey appears to understand the deeper constitutional attacks underpinning climate activists to assume any and all power to implement their green agenda.

Richard Lazarus, a law professor at Harvard, said “the court’s ruling is a major setback for E.P.A.’s ability to address climate change, and it could hardly have come at a worse time.”

“By insisting instead that an agency can promulgate an important and significant climate rule only by showing ‘clear congressional authorization’ at a time when the court knows that Congress is effectively dysfunctional, the court threatens to upend the national government’s ability to safeguard the public health and welfare at the very moment when the United States, and all nations, are facing our greatest environmental challenge of all: climate change,” he added.

The comments by Lazarus and Justice Kagan are alarming because they are essentially arguing that the challenges of going through the proper Congressional process are too great, and, in effect “the ends justify the means.” But if anyone should be arguing for adhering to the proper congressional process, it should be a justice of the Supreme Court.

The ruling did not hinder the EPAs ability to regulate the energy sector, it merely pushed back against the agency’s attempt to claim powers it was never given by Congress.

Read more about the questionable science of the EPA in our article here.

Dr. Zelenko Nearly Dies in “Last-Hope” Cancer Treatment, Allegedly Brought Back From the Brink Through Prayer, Doctors Baffled

By ,

Vigilant News Editor: Unfortunately, a day after this article was posted, Dr. Zelenko passed away. Read his obituary here.

 – Justin

Dr. Zev Zelenko, who became famous in early 2020 by developing a covid protocol that got the attention of President Trump, nearly died recently due to an undisclosed “very intense and extreme last-hope type of treatment,” according to a telegram post.

Dr. Zelenko stated in several interviews and in social media posts that he was diagnosed with terminal cancer.

Dr. Zelenko recently formed a foundation, to carry on his work. Prayers were called for him on Monday, but without any indication as to why.

In an update posted Tuesday afternoon, a man named Daniel described what happened during a “last-hope” treatment.

Here’s the complete post from Daniel.

Update on Dr. Zelenko:

As it was mentioned last night he has been intubated in the ICU after being put through a very intense and extreme last-hope type of treatment yesterday.  They were able to get about 2/3 of the treatment finished before they had to stop due to extremely high blood pressure from the procedure.  He started to stabilize throughout last night.

This morning things changed quickly and it looked like we were about to lose Zev for sure and everyone that was there prayed over him intensely for a miracle. Then that miracle happened and he started to recover, which seemed impossible.  This SHOCKED the doctors and nurses as they didn’t understand how it was happening!

He is still not in the clear yet but I thought you would all like to hear this update… please continue to pray for Zev!

Also, I have more info to share that is VERY positive but I want to wait and make sure it’s ok to go out first.

The Zelenko Freedom Foundation shared this update on Tuesday evening, after the above post by Daniel.

Father, friend, warrior and leader.  That is who our founder, Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko is.  Please continue to pray for Zev and keep him in your thoughts as he fights for his life.

Op-Ed: Globalists Need the Center of Attention, Musk is Ruining it for Them
Ash conformity on steroids.

By ,

Justin Deschamps, June 6th, 2022

The game of political control requires one to master and control the center of attention. That which we attend to we allow into our minds, informing our thoughts, opinions, and values that shape our actions.

For individuals and groups aligned with the truth, it guides the use of the center of attention to influence public policy and cultural discourse. The most influential benevolent people in history knew how to use the truth to claim the watching eyes of the masses, so-called prophets like Buddha and Jesus.

But for lairs and those who push malevolence, the need to be the center of attention is two-fold: to push a malevolent agenda, the group must be convinced of its necessity, and two, to defend the lie, the center of attention can’t be occupied by truth-tellers. 

The Asch Conformity Experiment proves this point scientifically. Briefly, the experiment requires a handful of liars coordinating their actions to convince the subject, a person who is the target for lie implantation. The innocent participant in the experiment is one person. But in the grander society and culture, the innocent participant is the sum total of all onlookers—the masses that consume social media and mainstream media.

So long as the stooges, or liars, maintain control over the center of attention, through the power of social influence, and brain centers designed to motivate people to conform to the group, the innocent participant can be convinced of the most insane lies, and even be made to go along with malevolence. Mass Formation Psychosis is a largescale version of Asch Conformity principles in action. Otherwise good people can be convinced, that, for example, a child that still believes in Santa Claus can decide to “change their gender”, a boy can decide to become a girl; and as a society, we should go along with the delusion, to include prescribing hormones and even surgeries that remove the confused child’s genitals, sterilizing them for life.

The center of attention of a large group imparts powers most of us never enjoy. After all, the world is shaped by a dedicated few.

Anyone, and anything, that can take and hold the center of attention has power over the group and culture. 

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” ~ Margaret Mead

A liar and fraud need to hold the center of attention. They crave it. They need it because, the only way to convince people of their lies—to control the narrative—is to hold the center of attention. With the deceitful narrative installed in the minds of spectators, the group can be controlled, like a sheepdog controls a herd of sheep. 

Anyone that threatens the liar in their ability to control the center of attention must be either recruited into the liar’s agenda, using threats, bribes, and other forms of coercion, or they must be destroyed.

Reputation destruction is essential to cripple the credibility of anyone not in league with the liar’s agenda so that any persuasive power is lost—so the group can’t be turned against the liar. 

Enter Elon Musk.

It’s not entirely clear Musk has the best interest for humanity. Musk has talked about fusing with machines as a way to manage the AI problem, along with developing Neurolink, a technology coveted by transhumanists who seek “symbiosis with machines”. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbIY0Mvv01k

Some suspect Musk was being groomed by the elite to help sell the idea of transhumanism to society, so that an Elysium super-human cyborg race is created, where the distinction between the elite class and the underclass of citizens is undeniable. 

Musk was a darling of the elite class for years.

According to Bill Gates, “what Elon did with Tesla is one of the greatest contributions to climate change anyone’s ever made.”

Musk has dozens of awards and accolades heaped upon him—which is usually a sign of reputation building by the establishment for use in the elite’s narrative control agenda. While the lying class of globalist controllers despises and attacks anyone who’s managed to steal the center of attention, (e.g. Trump, and now Musk), they also position prominent influencers in the center of attention to push their narrative. Justin Trudeau, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and scores of other groomed pushers of globalist agendas. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2IP_LQ4A6A

Trump was also largely accepted by the elite class, until, in 2016, he ran against their chosen center of attention, Hillary Clinton. Then it was all-out war against Trump, and anything he stands for the goes against the chosen narrative.

Now, Elon Musk, former darling of the elite, is under attack.

Musk has brought attention to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, he has declared free speech vitally important to civilization, and has exposed Twitter as a haven for bots, that are likely used to manipulate the thoughts and opinions of the people. These are not things the globalist class is in alignment with. 

 

For this, Musk has earned the scorn of his former darlings. CNBC wrote this piece, showcasing a photo with President Trump and Steve Bannon, two men who might as well be Hitler in the eyes of the mainstream. The message is clear when you consider the guilt by association tactics of the reputation destroying media: “Musk must go down. He’s a threat to the agenda.”

Whether you love Musk, hate him, or think he’s a tool of the transhumanist aspiring elite, the establishment’s shift toward him betrayals their strategy and motives. And with this playbook laid bare, it’s all that much easier to know the rules of the game. 

The center of attention, can’t be allowed to fall into the hands of anyone going against the narrative.

INJUSTICE: At Least 35 Child and Sex Abusers Never Prosecuted, Southern Baptist Convention List Confirms
Abuse goes unaddressed.

By ,

by Justin Deschamps, June 1, 2022

ATLANTA, GEORGA – The Southern Baptist Convention, released a list with over 200 entries, some of which detail alleged abusers who admitted to the abuse and were subsequently allows to continue working close to children. 

The Southern Baptist Church committee members announced in a meeting last Thursday, the 26th of May, that the list would be released to the public, which had been kept secret until now. 

This is just the latest development in an ongoing scandal regarding the Southern Baptist Convention. 

In 2019, a joint investigation of two news organizations, the San Antonio Express-News and the Houston Chronicle, revealed that most of the victims were shunned by their churches after complaints were filed. Furthermore, in what might be criminal activity, at least 35 of the alleged abusers were never charged and continued to work in positions close to potential victims, despite exhibiting predatory behavior. And some of the registered sex offenders continued preaching despite their criminal activity. In one case, a pastor abused dozens of girls and boys, settled with victims in a court case, and went on to a prestigious position in the Catholic Church close to the Pope, according to one confidential source. 

In 2018, Mark Aderholt was arrested in South Carolina on charges of sexual assault which occurred in 1996-97 when he was 25 as a Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (SWBTS) student. In 2019, Aderholt pled guilty and as part of the plea deal, his sentence was wiped clean and he will not be on the Sex Offender Registry. 

In 2007, International Mission Board (IMB), where Aderholt was employed, was informed of the abuse and an internal investigation led to Aderholt’s resignation. IMB did not report it to the police. Aderholt went on to work for three more religious organizations, the Immanuel Baptist Church, Little Rock, Arkansas, Central Baptist Church, North Little Rock, Arkansas, and the South Carolina Baptist Convention.

The Southern Baptist Convention is a Christian denomination based in the US and is the world’s largest Baptist denomination, and supports some 47,000 congregations with over 14 million members. The organization has come under fire over the years for its policies of essentially covering up abuse crimes of those accused of wrongdoing, in some cases, moving them to other positions where they went on to abuse other victims. 

The scandal is reminiscent of the Catholic Church abuse cases that emerged in the 1990s. In the latest development of that scandal, some 216,000 children in France alone had been sexually abused by members of the clergy since 1950. 

The numbers are so staggering that several documentaries have emerged suggesting that church authorities know predatory behavior is not just an isolated case, but it’s endemic. And that church officials are effectively in the business of covering up widespread abuse as a matter of policy.

A BLIND EYE VOL. I: CRISIS OF FAITH | Trailer
0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

A Blind Eye, at present, is a three-part series on the independent film service Dauntless Dialogue, home to dozens of high production value short films exposing corruption, details the harrowing examples of covered up abuse, some of which include horrific stories. 

Jules Woodson, was a victim of abuse at the hands of her youth pastor, Andy Savage, when she was in high school in 1998. “I felt acknowledged that they knew,” Woodson said. “But at the same time heartbreaking to see how many people they knew about and didn’t warn others.”

The report is just the “tip of the iceberg,” Woodson said. 

Child Protect, a children’s advocacy center, reports that “For every incident of child abuse or neglect that’s reported, an estimated two incidents go unreported.” This statistic confirms the findings of therapists that work with victims of familial and institutional abuse.

According to the late Dr. Charles L. Whitfield, some victims in families and institutions are sometimes convinced their memories of abuse are false. Abusers and co-abusers—usually spouses or parents who can’t accept the possibility abuse happened at the hands of people they know and love—look to dismiss allegations of abuse, claiming they’re false memories. The invalidation of victim experiences often causes lifelong mental illness and hardship.

The now-defunct False Memory Syndrome Foundation provided the justification these abusers seek to dismiss the claims of victims. The organization, previously promoted by Elizabeth Loftus, who she claims, is herself a victim of alleged false memories of abuse, states that there’s an epidemic of false memories. However, Loftus and other proponents of false memory syndrome advocates have never scientifically proven the existence of false memories of the severity experienced by abuse victims and have lost serval lawsuits over the years.